Comment on Bornmann (2017): confidence intervals for journal impact factors

David I. Stern

doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2507-7

Comment on Bornmann (2017): confidence intervals for journal impact factors

David I. Stern^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this Letter to the Editor I comment on a recent Letter from Lutz Bornmann. I argue that the Poisson distribution is not an appropriate simplifying assumption to make when computing confidence intervals for journal impact factors.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1811-1813
Number of pages	3
Journal	Scientometrics
Volume	113
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2507-7
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2017

Access to Document

10.1007/s11192-017-2507-7

Cite this

@article{0d2712f88ec3446a844c1e29557a52ae,

title = "Comment on Bornmann (2017): confidence intervals for journal impact factors",

abstract = "In this Letter to the Editor I comment on a recent Letter from Lutz Bornmann. I argue that the Poisson distribution is not an appropriate simplifying assumption to make when computing confidence intervals for journal impact factors.",

keywords = "Confidence interval, Journal impact factor",

author = "Stern, \{David I.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, Akad{\'e}miai Kiad{\'o}, Budapest, Hungary.",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s11192-017-2507-7",

language = "English",

volume = "113",

pages = "1811--1813",

journal = "Scientometrics",

issn = "0138-9130",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on Bornmann (2017)

T2 - confidence intervals for journal impact factors

AU - Stern, David I.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - In this Letter to the Editor I comment on a recent Letter from Lutz Bornmann. I argue that the Poisson distribution is not an appropriate simplifying assumption to make when computing confidence intervals for journal impact factors.

AB - In this Letter to the Editor I comment on a recent Letter from Lutz Bornmann. I argue that the Poisson distribution is not an appropriate simplifying assumption to make when computing confidence intervals for journal impact factors.

KW - Confidence interval

KW - Journal impact factor

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85028891696

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-017-2507-7

DO - 10.1007/s11192-017-2507-7

M3 - Letter

SN - 0138-9130

VL - 113

SP - 1811

EP - 1813

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

IS - 3

ER -

Comment on Bornmann (2017): confidence intervals for journal impact factors

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this