Comment on 'Low-lying 0+, T = 2 states of 12Be, 12C and 12O'

F. C. Barker

doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/3/038001

Comment on 'Low-lying 0⁺, T = 2 states of ¹²Be, ¹²C and ¹²O'

F. C. Barker

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A description of the low-lying A = 12, 0⁺, T = 2 states from 30 years ago has recently been criticized and an alternative description proposed that is claimed to agree better with experimental data. We here discuss this claim and suggest a different interpretation of some of the data.

Original language	English
Article number	038001
Journal	Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
Volume	36
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/36/3/038001
Publication status	Published - 2009

Access to Document

10.1088/0954-3899/36/3/038001

Cite this

@article{276bb985eef84ca68fffd08e8df3455f,

title = "Comment on 'Low-lying 0+, T = 2 states of 12Be, 12C and 12O'",

abstract = "A description of the low-lying A = 12, 0+, T = 2 states from 30 years ago has recently been criticized and an alternative description proposed that is claimed to agree better with experimental data. We here discuss this claim and suggest a different interpretation of some of the data.",

author = "Barker, \{F. C.\}",

year = "2009",

doi = "10.1088/0954-3899/36/3/038001",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

journal = "Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics",

issn = "0954-3899",

publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on 'Low-lying 0+, T = 2 states of 12Be, 12C and 12O'

AU - Barker, F. C.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - A description of the low-lying A = 12, 0+, T = 2 states from 30 years ago has recently been criticized and an alternative description proposed that is claimed to agree better with experimental data. We here discuss this claim and suggest a different interpretation of some of the data.

AB - A description of the low-lying A = 12, 0+, T = 2 states from 30 years ago has recently been criticized and an alternative description proposed that is claimed to agree better with experimental data. We here discuss this claim and suggest a different interpretation of some of the data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65749103100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/0954-3899/36/3/038001

DO - 10.1088/0954-3899/36/3/038001

M3 - Article

SN - 0954-3899

VL - 36

JO - Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics

JF - Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics

IS - 3

M1 - 038001

ER -

Comment on 'Low-lying 0+, T = 2 states of 12Be, 12C and 12O'

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this

Comment on 'Low-lying 0⁺, T = 2 states of ¹²Be, ¹²C and ¹²O'