Commentary on Dowling et al. (2016): Is it time to stop conducting problem gambling prevalence studies?

Francis Markham*, Martin Young

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The dual-frame survey conducted by Dowling and colleagues should cause gambling researchers to re-evaluate the scientific value of routinely conducting problem gambling prevalence studies. A better use of resources would support research designed to reduce the incidence of gambling-related harm rather than perpetuate its ongoing mismeasurement.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)436-437
    Number of pages2
    JournalAddiction
    Volume111
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary on Dowling et al. (2016): Is it time to stop conducting problem gambling prevalence studies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this