Abstract
The dual-frame survey conducted by Dowling and colleagues should cause gambling researchers to re-evaluate the scientific value of routinely conducting problem gambling prevalence studies. A better use of resources would support research designed to reduce the incidence of gambling-related harm rather than perpetuate its ongoing mismeasurement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 436-437 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Addiction |
Volume | 111 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2016 |