Comments on Coulthard amp; Johnson's (2007) portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison

doi:10.1080/00450610903147701

Comments on Coulthard amp; Johnson's (2007) portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their recent introduction to forensic linguistics, Coulthard amp; Johnson (2007) include a portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework for the evaluation of forensic comparison evidence (pp. 203-207). This portrayal includes a number of inaccuracies. The present letter attempts to correct these inaccuracies.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	155-161
Number of pages	7
Journal	Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Volume	41
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00450610903147701
Publication status	Published - Dec 2009

Access to Document

10.1080/00450610903147701

Cite this

@article{b81ad418db1f41979b0ddf87c4a58a1c,

title = "Comments on Coulthard amp; Johnson's (2007) portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework",

abstract = "In their recent introduction to forensic linguistics, Coulthard amp; Johnson (2007) include a portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework for the evaluation of forensic comparison evidence (pp. 203-207). This portrayal includes a number of inaccuracies. The present letter attempts to correct these inaccuracies.",

keywords = "Forensic linguistic comparison, Forensic voice comparison, Likelihood-ratio framework",

author = "Morrison, \{Geoffrey Stewart\}",

year = "2009",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1080/00450610903147701",

language = "English",

volume = "41",

pages = "155--161",

journal = "Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences",

issn = "0045-0618",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comments on Coulthard amp; Johnson's (2007) portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework

AU - Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - In their recent introduction to forensic linguistics, Coulthard amp; Johnson (2007) include a portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework for the evaluation of forensic comparison evidence (pp. 203-207). This portrayal includes a number of inaccuracies. The present letter attempts to correct these inaccuracies.

AB - In their recent introduction to forensic linguistics, Coulthard amp; Johnson (2007) include a portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework for the evaluation of forensic comparison evidence (pp. 203-207). This portrayal includes a number of inaccuracies. The present letter attempts to correct these inaccuracies.

KW - Forensic linguistic comparison

KW - Forensic voice comparison

KW - Likelihood-ratio framework

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/71649086927

U2 - 10.1080/00450610903147701

DO - 10.1080/00450610903147701

M3 - Article

SN - 0045-0618

VL - 41

SP - 155

EP - 161

JO - Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

JF - Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

IS - 2

ER -

Comments on Coulthard amp; Johnson's (2007) portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this