Committing to human rights in Australia’s corporate sector

Sally Wheeler*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper draws on data collected from ASX 50 listed corporations. As the UNGP makes clear a visible and accessible policy commitment is the most basic form of recognition that corporations can afford to human rights under the schema it offers. The paper takes the position that this policy commitment gives corporations a chance to declare a positive relationship with human rights. The presence or not of a policy statement, and the form that the statement takes, tells us much about the relationship between the corporate sector in Australia and human rights. The data reveals a low prevalence of policy commitment across the largest publically listed corporations in Australia. The paper selects a range of variables against which to examine whether commitment occurs or not. The most significant factor that supports policy commitment is membership of human rights engaged global Business and Industry Non-Governmental Organisations (BINGOs). We might expect a rather stronger public commitment to human rights reflecting the position apparently taken by Australian corporations on other ESG standards. However this expectation has to be set against the absence of human rights discourse as a political and cultural artefact at the domestic level.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)326-352
    Number of pages27
    JournalGriffith Law Review
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Committing to human rights in Australia’s corporate sector'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this