Common mental disorders, unemployment and psychosocial job quality: is a poor job better than no job at all?

Peter Butterworth, Liana Leach, Sally McManus, Stephen A Stansfeld

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Employment is associated with health benefits over unemployment, but the psychosocial characteristics of work also influence health. There has, however, been little research contrasting the prevalence of psychiatric disorders among people who are unemployed with those in jobs of differing psychosocial quality. Method Analysis of data from the English Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (APMS) considered the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs) among 2603 respondents aged between 21 and 54 years who were either (i) employed or (ii) unemployed and looking for work at the time of interview in 2007. Quality of work was assessed by the number of adverse psychosocial job conditions reported (low control, high demands, insecurity and low job esteem). RESULTS: The prevalence of CMDs was similar for those respondents who were unemployed and those in the poorest quality jobs. This pattern remained after controlling for relevant demographic and socio-economic covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Although employment is thought to promote mental health and well-being, work of poor psychosocial quality is not associated with any better mental health than unemployment. Policy efforts to improve community mental health should consider psychosocial job quality in conjunction with efforts to increase employment rates.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1763-1772
    JournalPsychological Medicine
    Volume43
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Common mental disorders, unemployment and psychosocial job quality: is a poor job better than no job at all?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this