TY - JOUR
T1 - Commoning contingent resources
T2 - constructing an Australian stem cell registry
AU - Santos, Dan
AU - Hu, Mengqi
AU - Lopes, Edilene
AU - Wells, Christine
AU - Leach, Joan
AU - Nicol, Dianne
AU - Ankeny, Rachel A.
PY - 2025/3/25
Y1 - 2025/3/25
N2 - Contemporary scientific research depends on sharing resources. Norms, cultures and infrastructures enable, incentivize or require sharing in particular ways. Commons are one type of infrastructure, and their key characteristics include the provision and governance of resources. Understanding how resources become part of a commons is critical for implementing arrangements that effectively facilitate scientific research. This article uses commons theory associated with knowledge resources to explore efforts to establish a registry for the Australian stem cell research community where registration is not a current norm. Analyzing the perspectives of stem cell researchers regarding registries, we make two contributions: (1) a conceptual contribution to the commons literature by explicating a more contingent understanding of resources, and (2) an empirical analysis of a relatively under-examined form of governance arrangement (i.e. registries). We emphasize paying close attention to the context-dependent processes through which resources are viewed as common-able and may subsequently become common-ed.
AB - Contemporary scientific research depends on sharing resources. Norms, cultures and infrastructures enable, incentivize or require sharing in particular ways. Commons are one type of infrastructure, and their key characteristics include the provision and governance of resources. Understanding how resources become part of a commons is critical for implementing arrangements that effectively facilitate scientific research. This article uses commons theory associated with knowledge resources to explore efforts to establish a registry for the Australian stem cell research community where registration is not a current norm. Analyzing the perspectives of stem cell researchers regarding registries, we make two contributions: (1) a conceptual contribution to the commons literature by explicating a more contingent understanding of resources, and (2) an empirical analysis of a relatively under-examined form of governance arrangement (i.e. registries). We emphasize paying close attention to the context-dependent processes through which resources are viewed as common-able and may subsequently become common-ed.
U2 - 10.1080/14636778.2025.2491997
DO - 10.1080/14636778.2025.2491997
M3 - Article
SN - 1463-6778
VL - 44
JO - New Genetics and Society
JF - New Genetics and Society
IS - 1
ER -