Commoning contingent resources: constructing an Australian stem cell registry

Dan Santos, Mengqi Hu, Edilene Lopes, Christine Wells, Joan Leach, Dianne Nicol, Rachel A. Ankeny

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Contemporary scientific research depends on sharing resources. Norms, cultures and infrastructures enable, incentivize or require sharing in particular ways. Commons are one type of infrastructure, and their key characteristics include the provision and governance of resources. Understanding how resources become part of a commons is critical for implementing arrangements that effectively facilitate scientific research. This article uses commons theory associated with knowledge resources to explore efforts to establish a registry for the Australian stem cell research community where registration is not a current norm. Analyzing the perspectives of stem cell researchers regarding registries, we make two contributions: (1) a conceptual contribution to the commons literature by explicating a more contingent understanding of resources, and (2) an empirical analysis of a relatively under-examined form of governance arrangement (i.e. registries). We emphasize paying close attention to the context-dependent processes through which resources are viewed as common-able and may subsequently become common-ed.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalNew Genetics and Society
    Volume44
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 25 Mar 2025

    Cite this