Communicating Science**

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Despite a growing understanding of the importance of inquiry learning and hands-on experiences in the classroom, science education generally operates within defined and somewhat old-fashioned curricula. There is much evidence that members of the general public, who are the products of this education, generally demonstrate an indifference to science and a lack of awareness of personal relevance of past or present research. Science education still has strong overtones of the deficit model, which has been rejected by science communication theorists and many practitioners for decades. The deficit model is fuelled by regular surveys of the public undertaken in Europe, the US and Australia which demonstrate a lack of knowledge of many simple scientific facts. In turn these surveys stimulate calls for improvement in general science literacy, which is seen to be deficient in most Western countries. The principles of science communication place the needs of the audience as the primary consideration, not the content of the scientific message. This chapter examines how this might happen in the classroom, while retaining the requirement for formal science education to address the needs of a wide group of students which includes future scientists as well as those who will not continue with scientific study.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationNavigating the Changing Landscape of Formal and Informal Science Learning Opportunities
    EditorsDeborah Corrigan, Cathy Buntting, Alister Jones, John Loughran
    Place of PublicationSwitzerland
    PublisherSpringer Cham
    Pages69-86
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)978-3-319-89760-8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Communicating Science**'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this