Comparable upper and lower bounds for boundary values of Neumann eigenfunctions and tight inclusion of eigenvalues

Alex H. Barnett, Andrew Hassell, Melissa Tacy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    For smooth bounded domains in ℝn, we prove upper and lower L2 bounds on the boundary data of Neumann eigenfunctions, and we prove quasiorthogonality of this boundary data in a spectral window. The bounds are tight in the sense that both are independent of the eigenvalues; this is achieved by working with an appropriate norm for boundary functions, which includes a spectral weight, that is, a function of the boundary Laplacian. This spectral weight is chosen to cancel concentration at the boundary that can happen for whispering gallery-type eigenfunctions. These bounds are closely related to wave equation estimates due to Tataru. Using this, we bound the distance from an arbitrary Helmholtz parameterE > 0 to the nearest Neumann eigenvalue in terms of boundary normal derivative data of a trial function u solving the Helmholtz equation (Δ - E)u = 0. This inclusion bound improves over previously known bounds by a factor of E5=6, analogously to a recently improved inclusion bound in the Dirichlet case due to the first two authors. Finally, we apply our theory to present an improved numerical implementation of the method of particular solutions for computation of Neumann eigenpairs on smooth planar domains. We show that the new inclusion bound improves the relative accuracy in a computed Neumann eigenvalue (around the 42000th) from nine to fourteen digits, with negligible extra numerical effort.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3059-3114
    Number of pages56
    JournalDuke Mathematical Journal
    Volume167
    Issue number16
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparable upper and lower bounds for boundary values of Neumann eigenfunctions and tight inclusion of eigenvalues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this