Comparative international law: Framing the field

Anthea Roberts, Paul B. Stephan, Pierre Hugues Verdier, Milav Versteeg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At first blush, "comparative international law" might sound like an oxymoron. In principle, international law--at least when it arises from multilateral treaties or general custom--applies equally to all parties or states. As a result, international lawyers often resist emphasizing local, national, or regional approaches due to the field's aspirations to universality and uniformity. Comparativists, meanwhile, frequently overlook the potential to apply comparative law insights to international law on the basis that "rules which are avowedly universal in character do not lend themselves to comparison." Here, Roberts et al examine different aspects of the comparative international law phenomenon and lay a theoretical and methodological foundation for this field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-474
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of International Law
Volume109
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative international law: Framing the field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this