TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative international law
T2 - Framing the field
AU - Roberts, Anthea
AU - Stephan, Paul B.
AU - Verdier, Pierre Hugues
AU - Versteeg, Milav
PY - 2015/7
Y1 - 2015/7
N2 - At first blush, "comparative international law" might sound like an oxymoron. In principle, international law--at least when it arises from multilateral treaties or general custom--applies equally to all parties or states. As a result, international lawyers often resist emphasizing local, national, or regional approaches due to the field's aspirations to universality and uniformity. Comparativists, meanwhile, frequently overlook the potential to apply comparative law insights to international law on the basis that "rules which are avowedly universal in character do not lend themselves to comparison." Here, Roberts et al examine different aspects of the comparative international law phenomenon and lay a theoretical and methodological foundation for this field.
AB - At first blush, "comparative international law" might sound like an oxymoron. In principle, international law--at least when it arises from multilateral treaties or general custom--applies equally to all parties or states. As a result, international lawyers often resist emphasizing local, national, or regional approaches due to the field's aspirations to universality and uniformity. Comparativists, meanwhile, frequently overlook the potential to apply comparative law insights to international law on the basis that "rules which are avowedly universal in character do not lend themselves to comparison." Here, Roberts et al examine different aspects of the comparative international law phenomenon and lay a theoretical and methodological foundation for this field.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952042795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.3.0467
DO - 10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.3.0467
M3 - Article
SN - 0002-9300
VL - 109
SP - 467
EP - 474
JO - American Journal of International Law
JF - American Journal of International Law
IS - 3
ER -