Comparing the identification of recommendations by different accident investigators using a common methodology

Chris W. Johnson, H. A. Oltedal, C. M. Holloway

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Accident reports play a key role in the safety of complex systems. These reports present the recommendations that are intended to help avoid any recurrence of past failures. However, the value of these findings depends upon the causal analysis that helps to identify the reasons why an accident occurred. Various techniques have been developed to help investigators distinguish root causes from contributory factors and contextual information. This paper presents the results from a study into the individual differences that can arise when a group of investigators independently apply the same technique to identify the causes of an accident. This work is important if we are to increase the consistency and coherence of investigations following major accidents..

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication7th IET International Conference on System Safety, Incorporating the Cyber Security Conference 2012
Edition607 CP
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event7th IET International Conference on System Safety, Incorporating the Cyber Security Conference 2012 - Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Duration: 15 Oct 201218 Oct 2012

Publication series

NameIET Conference Publications
Number607 CP
Volume2012

Conference

Conference7th IET International Conference on System Safety, Incorporating the Cyber Security Conference 2012
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityEdinburgh
Period15/10/1218/10/12

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the identification of recommendations by different accident investigators using a common methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this