TY - JOUR
T1 - Completing the Circle of the Social Sciences? William Beveridge and Social Biology at London School of Economics during the 1930s
AU - Renwick, Chris
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2013.
PY - 2014/7/8
Y1 - 2014/7/8
N2 - Much has been written about the relationship between biology and social science during the early twentieth century. However, discussion is often drawn toward a particular conception of eugenics, which tends to obscure our understanding of not only the wide range of intersections between biology and social science during the period but also their impact on subsequent developments. This paper draws attention to one of those intersections: the British economist and social reformer William Beveridge’s controversial efforts to establish a Department of Social Biology at London School of Economics during the 1920s and 1930s. Featuring a fully equipped laboratory headed by a leading geneticist, the Department of Social Biology was Beveridge’s attempt to “cross-fertilise” biology and social science and, in so doing, take the ideological heat out of social scientific, in particular economic, methods of investigation. Exploring why Beveridge’s project failed and throwing light on its long-term legacies, this paper considers what we can learn from the short-lived Department of Social Biology.
AB - Much has been written about the relationship between biology and social science during the early twentieth century. However, discussion is often drawn toward a particular conception of eugenics, which tends to obscure our understanding of not only the wide range of intersections between biology and social science during the period but also their impact on subsequent developments. This paper draws attention to one of those intersections: the British economist and social reformer William Beveridge’s controversial efforts to establish a Department of Social Biology at London School of Economics during the 1920s and 1930s. Featuring a fully equipped laboratory headed by a leading geneticist, the Department of Social Biology was Beveridge’s attempt to “cross-fertilise” biology and social science and, in so doing, take the ideological heat out of social scientific, in particular economic, methods of investigation. Exploring why Beveridge’s project failed and throwing light on its long-term legacies, this paper considers what we can learn from the short-lived Department of Social Biology.
KW - Department of Social Biology
KW - London School of Economics
KW - William Beveridge
KW - science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908504681&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0048393113480782
DO - 10.1177/0048393113480782
M3 - Article
SN - 0048-3931
VL - 44
SP - 478
EP - 496
JO - Philosophy of the Social Sciences
JF - Philosophy of the Social Sciences
IS - 4
ER -