Compulsory Income Management in the Northern Territory - Evaluating its impact

J. Rob Bray*, Matthew Gray, Kelly Hand, Ilan Katz

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australia has been experimenting with constraining the ways in which welfare recipients can spend their income support payments, limiting their ability to access cash and purchase some products. The policy objectives include to reduce spending on alcohol, gambling, pornography and tobacco in favour of meeting 'basic' family needs, especially for children, to limit the scope for financial harassment, encourage pro-social behaviours, and build financial capabilities. In the logic of the programs these outcomes are expected to be manifest at the individual, family and community levels. The policy has primarily impacted on Indigenous Australians as a result of its geographic targeting, although a recent report has recommended a more stringent version of the program be introduced universally to all welfare recipients other than the aged. The largest of these experiments is 'New Income Management' in the Northern Territory, which has had more than 35,000 participants since its introduction in 2010. This article reports on the key findings of the major independent evaluation of New Income Management commissioned by the Australian Government.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)373-396
    Number of pages24
    JournalAustralian Journal of Social Issues
    Volume50
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Compulsory Income Management in the Northern Territory - Evaluating its impact'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this