Conciliation and Article 298 Dispute Resolution Procedures under the Law of the Sea Convention

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter clarifies certain ideas about the practices of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), especially since the Philippines initiated the arbitration procedure against China in January 2013, a procedure in which China insists it will not participate. It also focuses on the application of the provisional arrangement in UNCLOS Article 74. States with maritime jurisdiction disputes should seek agreements to reach an equitable solution, and maritime delimitation would be the best option. However, such a solution might not be found easily in many disputed cases, where political posturing is diametrically opposed to the spirit of the UNCLOS. In order to resolve the disputes and better utilize resources, a provisional arrangement or a modus vivendi seems most feasible in the absence of a final resolution. Disputes emerging from the South China Sea are complicated since they include issues of island sovereignty, maritime delimitation, resource utilization, as well as non-traditional security.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationArbitration Concerning the South China Sea - Philipines versus China
    EditorsShicun Wu and Keyuan Zou
    Place of PublicationSurrey, England
    PublisherAshgate Publishing Ltd
    Pages55-70
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9781472459602
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conciliation and Article 298 Dispute Resolution Procedures under the Law of the Sea Convention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this