Conclusion: Community resilience in natural disasters

Anouk Ride, Diane Bretherton

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Looking back on the experience, the story was the modern age’s typical natural disaster. The causes were part natural (the disaster) and part human (poor infrastructure and planning) in the large city. When the disaster struck, it was the poor people living in the most vulnerable low-lying areas who were most likely to lose everything and least likely to have the resources to escape. When people responded, it was as groups of families trying to save themselves, then groups of volunteers with transport who went out to rescue strangers. But the government, army, and outside agencies took actions to impose control, not resilience, in the local population— they restricted movement, created relief camps, and then left people waiting and dependent.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCommunity Resilience in Natural Disasters
EditorsAnouk Ride, Diane Bretherton
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherPalgrave Macmillian
Chapter7
Pages169-193
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)978-0-230-33932-3
ISBN (Print)978-0-230-11428-9, 978-1-349-29585-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conclusion: Community resilience in natural disasters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this