@inbook{b7f4725195734eee9707bf3b14497773,
title = "Conclusions",
abstract = "In the preceding chapters I have discussed a range of theoretical perspectives on medical ethics education. However this has not been offered as a singular {\textquoteleft}grand {\textquoteleft}theory{\textquoteright} of medical ethics education but, rather, it amounts to a number of overlapping and interlinked theoretical lenses that can be used to illuminate the subject from a number of directions. I have given shape to the topic through two chapters focused on the history of medical ethics education in the UK. In these I focused on how the development of medical ethics education relates to changes that were contemporaneously occurring within medical education itself. This included the (global) development of the reflective paradigm as a signature pedagogy of medical and professional education (Shulman 2005) as well as the introduction {\textquoteleft}outsiders{\textquoteright} (or {\textquoteleft}insider-outsiders{\textquoteright}) to UK medical education. Just as these have became embedded within medical culture so has the practice of medical ethics. This has modulated the critical function of medical ethics, a fact that is indicative of its success.",
keywords = "Ethical Dilemma, Medical Ethic, Medical Professional, Medical Student, Moral Psychology",
author = "Nathan Emmerich",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2013, The Author(s).",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-00485-3_6",
language = "English",
series = "SpringerBriefs in Ethics",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
pages = "97--111",
booktitle = "SpringerBriefs in Ethics",
address = "Switzerland",
}