Conditions of successful reintegration ceremonies: Dealing with juvenile offenders

John Braithwaite*, Stephen Mugford

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter offers an optimistic view of at least one area—the punishment of juvenile offenders. It argues that it is possible to develop practices that ‘work’—both in the sense of reducing recidivism and reintegrating offenders into a wider web of community ties and support and, at the same time, in giving victims a ‘voice’ in a fashion that is both satisfying and also socially productive. Shame and shaming is commonly used in both programmes to describe what is going on; reintegration is commonly used in Wagga, while healing is more commonly used in Auckland for this aspect of the process. Courtroom ceremonies tend to degradation rather than reintegration—that is, they remove both event and perpetrator from the everyday domain in just the way suggested by Garfinkel. Reintegration ceremonies succeed when one side makes an early gesture of self-blame or self-deprecation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCorrectional Ethics
    EditorsJohn Kleinig
    Place of PublicationSurrey, United Kingdom
    PublisherTaylor and Francis
    Pages327-359
    Number of pages33
    Volume1
    Edition1
    ISBN (Electronic)9781315095387
    ISBN (Print)9780754624318
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conditions of successful reintegration ceremonies: Dealing with juvenile offenders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this