Confirmation of a late middle Pleistocene age for the Omo Kibish 1 cranium by direct uranium-series dating

Maxime Aubert*, Alistair W.G. Pike, Chris Stringer, Antonis Bartsiokas, Les Kinsley, Stephen Eggins, Michael Day, Rainer Grün

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    37 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    While it is generally accepted that modern humans evolved in Africa, the specific physical evidence for that origin remains disputed. The modern-looking Omo 1 skeleton, discovered in the Kibish region of Ethiopia in 1967, was controversially dated at ∼130 ka (thousands of years ago) by U-series dating on associated Mollusca, and it was not until 2005 that Ar-Ar dating on associated feldspar crystals in pumice clasts provided evidence for an even older age of ∼195 ka. However, questions continue to be raised about the age and stratigraphic position of this crucial fossil specimen. Here we present direct U-series determinations on the Omo 1 cranium. In spite of significant methodological complications, which are discussed in detail, the results indicate that the human remains do not belong to a later intrusive burial and are the earliest representative of anatomically modern humans. Given the more archaic morphology shown by the apparently contemporaneous Omo 2 calvaria, we suggest that direct U-series dating is applied to this fossil as well, to confirm its age in relation to Omo 1.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)704-710
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Human Evolution
    Volume63
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Confirmation of a late middle Pleistocene age for the Omo Kibish 1 cranium by direct uranium-series dating'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this