TY - JOUR
T1 - Conflict and Consensus in Committees of the Australian Parliament
AU - Halligan, John Angus
AU - Reid, Richard
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The extension of dissent to committee reporting in the Australian parliament has been one product of a period of significant institutional change. Previously, the norm of consensuality had primarily produced unanimous committee reports; however, during the 1980s and 1990s dissenting reports became more common. This article demonstrates that the trend for dissent in committee reporting has continued and reached heightened levels in the Senate. In addition, the conditions of the hung parliament, 2010–2013, significantly increased the level of dissent in the committees of the House of Representatives. These developments have important implications for how parliament functions and how debate is conducted on issues of public policy.
AB - The extension of dissent to committee reporting in the Australian parliament has been one product of a period of significant institutional change. Previously, the norm of consensuality had primarily produced unanimous committee reports; however, during the 1980s and 1990s dissenting reports became more common. This article demonstrates that the trend for dissent in committee reporting has continued and reached heightened levels in the Senate. In addition, the conditions of the hung parliament, 2010–2013, significantly increased the level of dissent in the committees of the House of Representatives. These developments have important implications for how parliament functions and how debate is conducted on issues of public policy.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/55655144000
U2 - 10.1093/pa/gsv044
DO - 10.1093/pa/gsv044
M3 - Article
VL - 69
SP - 230
EP - 248
JO - Parliamentary Affairs
JF - Parliamentary Affairs
IS - 2
ER -