TY - JOUR
T1 - Conflicts of interest in divisions of general practice
AU - Palmer, N.
AU - Braunack-Mayer, Annette
AU - Rogers, W.
AU - Provis, C.
AU - Cullity, G.
PY - 2006/12
Y1 - 2006/12
N2 - Community-based healthcare organisations manage competing, and often conflicting, priorities. These conflicts can arise from the multiple roles these organisations take up, and from the diverse range of stakeholders to whom they must be responsive. Often such conflicts may be titled conflicts of interest; however, what precisely constitutes such conflicts and what should be done about them is not always clear. Clarity about the duties owed by organisations and the roles they assume can help identify and manage some of these conflicts. Taking divisions of general practice in Australia as an examgle, this paper sets out to distinguish two main types of con icts of interest, so that they may be more clearly identified and more effectively managed.
AB - Community-based healthcare organisations manage competing, and often conflicting, priorities. These conflicts can arise from the multiple roles these organisations take up, and from the diverse range of stakeholders to whom they must be responsive. Often such conflicts may be titled conflicts of interest; however, what precisely constitutes such conflicts and what should be done about them is not always clear. Clarity about the duties owed by organisations and the roles they assume can help identify and manage some of these conflicts. Taking divisions of general practice in Australia as an examgle, this paper sets out to distinguish two main types of con icts of interest, so that they may be more clearly identified and more effectively managed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845745762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jme.2005.014811
DO - 10.1136/jme.2005.014811
M3 - Article
C2 - 17145912
AN - SCOPUS:33845745762
SN - 0306-6800
VL - 32
SP - 715
EP - 717
JO - Journal of Medical Ethics
JF - Journal of Medical Ethics
IS - 12
ER -