Confronting a disciplinary blindness: Women, war and rape in the international politics of security

Katrina Lee Koo*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    42 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Much of the debate surrounding the inclusion of women in the study of international politics, particularly in reflections of war, promotes passive representation. State-sanctioned images of non-combatant women in supportive wartime roles reflect, rather than confront, traditional conceptualisations of 'legitimate knowledge' and ways of knowing. Therefore, estimates that 30,000 women were raped during the war in Bosnia shocked the international community. Yet it shouldn't. War rape is as old as war itself. This article looks at why, and how, traditional forms of theorising about international politics fails to identify or vocalise the violent insecurities of women in domestic and international space, thus ensuring women's silence. It also draws on alternative ways of knowing to confront the tradition and to un/recover the experiences of women.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)525-536
    Number of pages12
    JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
    Volume37
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Confronting a disciplinary blindness: Women, war and rape in the international politics of security'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this