Connectivity, dispersal behaviour and conservation under climate change: A response to Hodgson et al.

Veronica A.J. Doerr*, Tom Barrett, Erik D. Doerr

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    135 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Hodgson et al. [Journal of Applied Ecology46 (2009) 964] argue that connectivity is complex and uncertain, that it can be improved incidentally by increasing habitat extent, and that connectivity conservation is unlikely to be effective under climate change. 2.We believe that they have overlooked recent research on dispersal behaviour and structural connectivity, which has improved our understanding of functional connectivity and revealed that it will not necessarily increase with habitat extent. 3.New modelling techniques including least-cost path models incorporate this more detailed understanding of connectivity into conservation planning, facilitating the true aim of connectivity conservation - to ensure appropriate interactions between habitat extent, quality and connectivity. 4.Synthesis and applications. Advances in behavioural research and modelling techniques allow us to manage structural connectivity with as much certainty as we manage extent and quality of habitat. Successful landscape conservation to address both current threats and future climate change must manage these three elements in concert.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)143-147
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
    Volume48
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Connectivity, dispersal behaviour and conservation under climate change: A response to Hodgson et al.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this