TY - JOUR
T1 - Conservation social science
T2 - Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation
AU - Bennett, Nathan J.
AU - Roth, Robin
AU - Klain, Sarah C.
AU - Chan, Kai
AU - Christie, Patrick
AU - Clark, Douglas A.
AU - Cullman, Georgina
AU - Curran, Deborah
AU - Durbin, Trevor J.
AU - Epstein, Graham
AU - Greenberg, Alison
AU - Nelson, Michael P.
AU - Sandlos, John
AU - Stedman, Richard
AU - Teel, Tara L.
AU - Thomas, Rebecca
AU - Veríssimo, Diogo
AU - Wyborn, Carina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Authors
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - It has long been claimed that a better understanding of human or social dimensions of environmental issues will improve conservation. The social sciences are one important means through which researchers and practitioners can attain that better understanding. Yet, a lack of awareness of the scope and uncertainty about the purpose of the conservation social sciences impedes the conservation community's effective engagement with the human dimensions. This paper examines the scope and purpose of eighteen subfields of classic, interdisciplinary and applied conservation social sciences and articulates ten distinct contributions that the social sciences can make to understanding and improving conservation. In brief, the conservation social sciences can be valuable to conservation for descriptive, diagnostic, disruptive, reflexive, generative, innovative, or instrumental reasons. This review and supporting materials provides a succinct yet comprehensive reference for conservation scientists and practitioners. We contend that the social sciences can help facilitate conservation policies, actions and outcomes that are more legitimate, salient, robust and effective.
AB - It has long been claimed that a better understanding of human or social dimensions of environmental issues will improve conservation. The social sciences are one important means through which researchers and practitioners can attain that better understanding. Yet, a lack of awareness of the scope and uncertainty about the purpose of the conservation social sciences impedes the conservation community's effective engagement with the human dimensions. This paper examines the scope and purpose of eighteen subfields of classic, interdisciplinary and applied conservation social sciences and articulates ten distinct contributions that the social sciences can make to understanding and improving conservation. In brief, the conservation social sciences can be valuable to conservation for descriptive, diagnostic, disruptive, reflexive, generative, innovative, or instrumental reasons. This review and supporting materials provides a succinct yet comprehensive reference for conservation scientists and practitioners. We contend that the social sciences can help facilitate conservation policies, actions and outcomes that are more legitimate, salient, robust and effective.
KW - Conservation biology
KW - Conservation science
KW - Conservation social science
KW - Environmental management
KW - Environmental social science
KW - Human dimensions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007190451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006
M3 - Review article
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 205
SP - 93
EP - 108
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
ER -