Constitutional Characterisation: Embedding Value Judgements About the Relationship Between the Legislation and the Judiciary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Tis article considers the process of characterising a Commonwealth law with respect to a federal head of power, organising the enquiry into three distinct steps of determining the essentialcharacter of a power, the definitional character of a power and the telescopiccharacter of a power. Te article then contends that this constitutional schema of characterisation disguises judicial value judgements about the proper scope of judicial review. Te article concludes by reflecting on the application of this schema to the High Courts decisions in Spence v Queensland (2019) 268 CLR 355 and Love v Commonwealth (2020) 375 ALR 597.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-322
JournalMelbourne University Law Review
Volume45
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constitutional Characterisation: Embedding Value Judgements About the Relationship Between the Legislation and the Judiciary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this