Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Constitutional Characterisation: Embedding Value Judgements About the Relationship Between the Legislation and the Judiciary

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Tis article considers the process of characterising a Commonwealth law with respect to a federal head of power, organising the enquiry into three distinct steps of determining the essentialcharacter of a power, the definitional character of a power and the telescopiccharacter of a power. Te article then contends that this constitutional schema of characterisation disguises judicial value judgements about the proper scope of judicial review. Te article concludes by reflecting on the application of this schema to the High Courts decisions in Spence v Queensland (2019) 268 CLR 355 and Love v Commonwealth (2020) 375 ALR 597.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)277-322
    JournalMelbourne University Law Review
    Volume45
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Constitutional Characterisation: Embedding Value Judgements About the Relationship Between the Legislation and the Judiciary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this