Contagion and banking crisis - International evidence for 2007-2009

Mardi Dungey*, Dinesh Gajurel

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    94 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Policy makers aim to avoid banking crises, and although they can to some extent control domestic conditions, internationally transmitted crises are difficult to tackle. This paper identifies international contagion in banking during the 2007-2009 crisis for 54 economies. We identify three channels of contagion - systematic, idiosyncratic and volatility - and find evidence for these in 45 countries. Banking crises are overwhelmingly associated with the presence of both systematic and idiosyncratic contagion. The results reveal that crisis shocks transmitted from a foreign jurisdiction via idiosyncratic contagion increase the likelihood of a systemic crisis in the domestic banking system by almost 37 percent, whereas increased exposure via systematic contagion does not necessarily destabilize the domestic banking system. Thus while policy makers and regulatory authorities are rightly concerned with the systematic transmission of banking crises, reducing the potential for idiosyncratic contagion can importantly reduce the consequences for the domestic economy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)271-283
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Banking and Finance
    Volume60
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Contagion and banking crisis - International evidence for 2007-2009'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this