Contemporary geometry for the built design?

Stephen T. Hyde

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    I explore the terrain that lies between architecture and geometry, from the perspective of a structural scientist with no professional architectural expertise. The divide between these disciplines perhaps stems from an ancient dichotomy between the art versus engineering schools of architecture, fertilised by the current dogma that art and science can never meet. Architects stand to gain much from study of the spectacular advances in geometry in recent decades, such as the growing understanding of cellular patterns in space, tiles, nets and curved surfaces. Some examples of those advances are discussed in detail. I conclude that both architecture and geometry would benefit from a renewed mutual interest.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)110-124
    Number of pages15
    JournalArchitectural Theory Review
    Volume15
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary geometry for the built design?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this