Corporatisation of community pharmacy and the constitutional prohibition of civil conscription for medical service providers

Caitlin Yazidjoglou, Thomas Faunce*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This column examines recommendations from the Harper Competition Policy Review relating to the opening up to corporate ownership of the community pharmacy sector in Australia. After studying the outcomes of similar proposals in other nations, it examines whether s 51(xxiiiA) of the Australian Constitution provides a prohibition against such a reduction of the small business option for those pharmacists wishing to develop a pharmacy business in Australia. An analysis of the services provided by community pharmacists finds that services such as the provision of advice on the safe and efficacious use of medicine, the prescribing and administering of vaccinations, the treatment of minor wounds and ailments, the provision of pharmacist-only medicines, and diabetes education all form part of the core function of community pharmacists. Given that these services are fundamentally medical in nature, in their current role community pharmacists as Commonwealth-regulated medical service providers for the purposes of s 51(xxiiiA) are thereby protected against Commonwealth policy or legislation facilitating civil conscription.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)41-60
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of law and medicine
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Corporatisation of community pharmacy and the constitutional prohibition of civil conscription for medical service providers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this