Correction: Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence (Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. (2018) DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a)

Robyn M. Lucas; Rachel E. Neale; Sasha Madronich; Richard L. McKenzie

doi:10.1039/c8pp90034e

Correction: Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence (Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. (2018) DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a)

Robyn M. Lucas^*, Rachel E. Neale, Sasha Madronich, Richard L. McKenzie

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Correction for 'Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence' by Robyn M. Lucas et al., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2018, DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1964
Number of pages	1
Journal	Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences
Volume	17
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1039/c8pp90034e
Publication status	Published - 2018

Access to Document

10.1039/c8pp90034e

Cite this

@article{d3962c694a834f8c83e9e1a61106051e,

title = "Correction: Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence (Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. (2018) DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a)",

abstract = "Correction for 'Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence' by Robyn M. Lucas et al., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2018, DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a.",

author = "Lucas, \{Robyn M.\} and Neale, \{Rachel E.\} and Sasha Madronich and McKenzie, \{Richard L.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Royal Society of Chemistry and Owner Societies.",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1039/c8pp90034e",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "1964",

journal = "Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences",

issn = "1474-905X",

publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",

number = "12",

}

Correction: Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence (Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. (2018) DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a). / Lucas, Robyn M.; Neale, Rachel E.; Madronich, Sasha et al.
In: Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 12, 2018, p. 1964.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction

T2 - Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence (Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. (2018) DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a)

AU - Lucas, Robyn M.

AU - Neale, Rachel E.

AU - Madronich, Sasha

AU - McKenzie, Richard L.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Correction for 'Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence' by Robyn M. Lucas et al., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2018, DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a.

AB - Correction for 'Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence' by Robyn M. Lucas et al., Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2018, DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85058180669

U2 - 10.1039/c8pp90034e

DO - 10.1039/c8pp90034e

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 1474-905X

VL - 17

SP - 1964

JO - Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences

JF - Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences

IS - 12

ER -

Correction: Are current guidelines for sun protection optimal for health? Exploring the evidence (Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. (2018) DOI: 10.1039/c7pp00374a)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this