Corrigendum to ‘Are Kinematics an Indicator of Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty?’[The Journal of Arthroplasty 39 (2024) 343-349] (The Journal of Arthroplasty (2024) 39(2) (343–349.e1), (S0883540323008082), (10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.010))

The authors regret that they have noted some discrepancies throughout the original published article. The legends for Figures 5C and 5D are swapped. The results and legend for figure 2C should indicate that during step-up, a higher OKS was associated with more external femoral rotation at terminal extension (β = -0.012; exp [β] = 0.988). The text and legend for figure 4E should indicate that during step-up, an improved surgical satisfaction score was associated more external femoral rotation at terminal extension. The beta value was incorrectly written as (β = -0.673; exp [β] = 1.124), and should be (β = 0.11; exp [β] = 1.12), indicating a positive relationship. The text and legend for figure 4C should indicate that during kneeling, an improved surgical satisfaction score was associated with more anterior femoral position at max flexion (β = -0.049; exp [β] = 0.953). The text and legend for figure 5C should indicate that during kneeling, an improved Pain VAS was associated with more anterior femoral position at max flexion (β = -0.060; exp [β] = 0.942) and the text and legend for figure 5E should indicate an association with more external femoral rotation at terminal extension during step-up (β = 0.102; exp [β] = 1.107). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.