Cosmic Perspectives and the Myths We Need to Survive

Charles Lineweaver

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Big history can be defined as the attempt to understand the integrated history of the cosmos, Earth, life and humanity. Cosmic perspectives and biological evolution are the main scientific ingredients that can convert and broaden history into big history. The aim of this paper is to describe a dilemma that such a scientific, Darwinian big history must face: the inevitable incompatibility between an objective scientific search for truth and an evolutionary compulsion for brains to harbor useful fictions the myths we need to survive. Science supports both sides of this dilemma. New and improved cosmic perspectives cant just be scientifically accurate. To be of use they must leave room for the myths we humans need to survive. But, what are those myths? I discuss and question whether the following ideas qualify as such myths: a belief in an objective meaning for human life, humanism/speciesism, human free will and stewardship of the Earth.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)81-93
    JournalThe Journal of Big History
    Volume3
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cosmic Perspectives and the Myths We Need to Survive'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this