TY - JOUR
T1 - Costing biodiversity protection
T2 - payments for environmental services schemes in Lao PDR
AU - Scheufele, Gabriela
AU - Bennett, Jeff
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy Ltd.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - A Payments for Environmental Services (PES) scheme that involves setting a ‘pseudo market price’ requires the estimation of demand and supply. This paper presents the estimated marginal costs of anti-poaching patrols designed to enhance biodiversity in two protected areas in Lao PDR. This supply information was used in conjunction with environmental production functions and estimated demand for biodiversity to determine the ‘price’ paid per patrol. Marginal costs were estimated through uniform-price conservation actions: Teams of local people interested in being part of the PES scheme bid for the number of patrols they would like to provide in response to a range of offered prices. The auction process generated a sequence of well-behaved price-quantity pairs that track the individual marginal cost function of each bidding team accounting for both fixed and variable costs. The marginal costs vary across bidders. These variations can be explained by differences in competing employment and income opportunities across bidders, village locations and seasons. The results provide evidence of heterogeneous opportunity costs of supply and suggest an efficiency loss in assuming homogeneity.
AB - A Payments for Environmental Services (PES) scheme that involves setting a ‘pseudo market price’ requires the estimation of demand and supply. This paper presents the estimated marginal costs of anti-poaching patrols designed to enhance biodiversity in two protected areas in Lao PDR. This supply information was used in conjunction with environmental production functions and estimated demand for biodiversity to determine the ‘price’ paid per patrol. Marginal costs were estimated through uniform-price conservation actions: Teams of local people interested in being part of the PES scheme bid for the number of patrols they would like to provide in response to a range of offered prices. The auction process generated a sequence of well-behaved price-quantity pairs that track the individual marginal cost function of each bidding team accounting for both fixed and variable costs. The marginal costs vary across bidders. These variations can be explained by differences in competing employment and income opportunities across bidders, village locations and seasons. The results provide evidence of heterogeneous opportunity costs of supply and suggest an efficiency loss in assuming homogeneity.
KW - Anti-poaching patrols
KW - biodiversity protection
KW - conservation auction
KW - marginal cost of supply
KW - payments for environmental services schemes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068887494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21606544.2018.1458657
DO - 10.1080/21606544.2018.1458657
M3 - Article
SN - 2160-6544
VL - 7
SP - 386
EP - 402
JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy
JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy
IS - 4
ER -