TY - JOUR
T1 - Cracks before the crisis
T2 - Polarization prior to COVID-19 predicts increased collective angst and economic pessimism
AU - Crimston, Charlie R.
AU - Selvanathan, Hema Preya
AU - Álvarez, Belén
AU - Jetten, Jolanda
AU - Bentley, Sarah
AU - Casara, Bruno Gabriel Salvador
AU - Ionescu, Octavia
AU - Krug, Henning
AU - Steffens, Niklas K.
AU - Tanjitpiyanond, Porntida
AU - Wibisono, Susilo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - We examine how polarization within societies is associated with reduced confidence in national responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis. We surveyed 4,731 participants across nine countries at Wave 1 (France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Thailand, the United Kingdom and the United States), and then, at Wave 2 (3 months later), we recontacted 840 participants from two countries (the United Kingdom and the United States). We found that perceived polarization in the years preceding COVID-19 predicted an enhanced perception that a country's COVID response was anomic (i.e., disorganized, chaotic), which in turn predicted greater collective angst and economic pessimism. Moreover, polarization measured at Wave 1 continued to predict perceptions that the COVID-19 response was anomic at Wave 2, and, in turn, enhanced collective angst, pessimism, and the perception that dramatic political change was required to recover from COVID-19. Our findings highlight how polarization may be associated with reduced confidence in leaders and governments at times of crisis, and how this predicts future-focused anxiety and pessimism.
AB - We examine how polarization within societies is associated with reduced confidence in national responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis. We surveyed 4,731 participants across nine countries at Wave 1 (France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Thailand, the United Kingdom and the United States), and then, at Wave 2 (3 months later), we recontacted 840 participants from two countries (the United Kingdom and the United States). We found that perceived polarization in the years preceding COVID-19 predicted an enhanced perception that a country's COVID response was anomic (i.e., disorganized, chaotic), which in turn predicted greater collective angst and economic pessimism. Moreover, polarization measured at Wave 1 continued to predict perceptions that the COVID-19 response was anomic at Wave 2, and, in turn, enhanced collective angst, pessimism, and the perception that dramatic political change was required to recover from COVID-19. Our findings highlight how polarization may be associated with reduced confidence in leaders and governments at times of crisis, and how this predicts future-focused anxiety and pessimism.
KW - COVID-19
KW - anomie
KW - collective angst
KW - polarization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132773965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2845
DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2845
M3 - Article
SN - 0046-2772
JO - European Journal of Social Psychology
JF - European Journal of Social Psychology
ER -