Creating and recreating iraq: Legacies of the mandate system in contemporary understandings of third world sovereignty

Usha Natarajan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the League of Nations' role in state formation in Third World or peripheral states and its legacy for contemporary understandings of Third World sovereignty. It examines Iraq under British Mandate, and UN and Coalition of the Willing interventions. This research was prompted by the international-law community's outrage when the Coalition invaded Iraq in March 2003. While the invasion was seen by many as an affront to international law, there was also something faintly familiar about the Coalition's reasoning for the invasion. This feeling of d vu escalated once regime change was followed by lengthy nation-building. The idea of recreating Iraq was not a new one. The British were tasked with something similar under the League of Nations Mandate System. UN interventions into failed states also attempt comparable transformations. Indeed, the more one contemplates international law's interventions in Iraq, the less shocking the Coalition's invasion becomes. It starts seeming foreseeable and even inevitable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)799-822
Number of pages24
JournalLeiden Journal of International Law
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Creating and recreating iraq: Legacies of the mandate system in contemporary understandings of third world sovereignty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this