Abstract
In this paper I offer a way to reconcile ‘functionalist’ and ‘institutionalist’
definitions of art. Inspired by Helen Longino’s ‘critical contextual empiricism’, I argue that art arises from social epistemic procedures that encompass both aesthetic functions and institutional practices. Within these procedures, aesthetic functions are developed, validated, and enforced through
institutional practices rather than being solely tied to the artistic outcomes
of those practices. I call this approach ‘critical contextual aestheticism’
definitions of art. Inspired by Helen Longino’s ‘critical contextual empiricism’, I argue that art arises from social epistemic procedures that encompass both aesthetic functions and institutional practices. Within these procedures, aesthetic functions are developed, validated, and enforced through
institutional practices rather than being solely tied to the artistic outcomes
of those practices. I call this approach ‘critical contextual aestheticism’
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 10-21 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Debates in Aesthetics |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critical Contextual Aestheticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver