TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-country effects and policy responses to COVID-19 in 2020
T2 - The Nordic countries
AU - Gordon, Daniel V.
AU - Grafton, R. Quentin
AU - Steinshamn, Stein Ivar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - We provide a three-step analysis of the effects and responses to COVID-19 in Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden), large Western European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom) and OECD Europe. First, we compare public health trends over 2020 in terms of per capita COVID-19 cases, fatalities, testing and the stringency of social distancing (SD) measures. Second, in a ‘like-with-like’ policy response model between Nordic countries, we test for the effects of air border closures on the growth in per capita COVID-19 cases while accounting for differences in stringency of social distancing and other measures. Third, using data from OECD European countries, we regress percentage change in GDP (2020–2019) on cumulative per capita national COVID-19 fatalities. We find that: (1) Sweden is an outlier, relative to its Nordic neighbours, in its COVID-19 public health outcomes; (2) Sweden would have had reduced cases and fatalities if it had adopted the air border closures implemented by its Nordic neighbours in the first half of 2020; and, (3) for OECD Europe, there is a statistically significant and negative association between per capita COVID-19 fatalities and economic performance.
AB - We provide a three-step analysis of the effects and responses to COVID-19 in Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden), large Western European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom) and OECD Europe. First, we compare public health trends over 2020 in terms of per capita COVID-19 cases, fatalities, testing and the stringency of social distancing (SD) measures. Second, in a ‘like-with-like’ policy response model between Nordic countries, we test for the effects of air border closures on the growth in per capita COVID-19 cases while accounting for differences in stringency of social distancing and other measures. Third, using data from OECD European countries, we regress percentage change in GDP (2020–2019) on cumulative per capita national COVID-19 fatalities. We find that: (1) Sweden is an outlier, relative to its Nordic neighbours, in its COVID-19 public health outcomes; (2) Sweden would have had reduced cases and fatalities if it had adopted the air border closures implemented by its Nordic neighbours in the first half of 2020; and, (3) for OECD Europe, there is a statistically significant and negative association between per capita COVID-19 fatalities and economic performance.
KW - Border closures
KW - Health-economic trade-offs
KW - Social distancing
KW - Sweden
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105335448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eap.2021.04.015
DO - 10.1016/j.eap.2021.04.015
M3 - Article
SN - 0313-5926
VL - 71
SP - 198
EP - 210
JO - Economic Analysis and Policy
JF - Economic Analysis and Policy
ER -