Cross-cultural development of an abridged job insecurity measure

Cynthia Lee*, Philip Bobko, Susan Ashford, Zhen Xiong Chen, Xiaopeng Ren

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    48 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Using four samples from the United States and China, we developed two theoretically based abridged job insecurity (JI) scales to address researcher concerns with the length of the original 57-item scale. These two scales contained all the components of the scale originally developed and validated by Ashford et al., 1989. Our abridged scale has 37 items (18 items for job features, 16 items for total job, and 3 items for powerlessness). We further developed a bare-bones scale with only 25 items (10 items for job features, 12 items for total job, and 3 items for powerlessness). Results show that the content and construct validities of both the abridged and the bare-bones scales are highly similar to the original JI scale. Our results provide support for the use of either the abridged or the bare-bones JI scales.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)373-390
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
    Volume29
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-cultural development of an abridged job insecurity measure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this