TY - JOUR
T1 - Cultural Differences in Reactions to Suicidal Ideation
T2 - A Mixed Methods Comparison of Korea and Australia
AU - An, Soontae
AU - Cruwys, Tegan
AU - Lee, Hannah
AU - Chang, Melissa Xue Ling
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Crown Copyright in the Commonwealth of Australia. Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of International Academy for Suicide Research.
PY - 2020/7/2
Y1 - 2020/7/2
N2 - There is evidence for cultural differences in mental health symptoms and help-seeking, but no past research has explored cultural differences in how people react to suicidal ideation communicated by others. Layperson reactions are critical, because the majority of people who experience suicidal ideation disclose to friends or family. Participants were 506 people aged 17–65 recruited from Australia and Korea who completed an experiment in which they responded to a friend who was experiencing either subclinical distress or suicidal ideation. Korean participants did not differentiate between the subclinical and suicidal targets, whereas Australian participants showed more concern for the suicidal target. For both targets, Korean participants were more likely to recommend passive coping strategies (“Time will solve everything” or “Cheer up”), while Australian participants were more likely to recommend active coping strategies (“Let’s talk” or “See a doctor”). This study provides the first evidence of cultural differences in the way people typically respond to disclosures of suicidal ideation, and suggests that unhelpful and inappropriate recommendations are commonplace.
AB - There is evidence for cultural differences in mental health symptoms and help-seeking, but no past research has explored cultural differences in how people react to suicidal ideation communicated by others. Layperson reactions are critical, because the majority of people who experience suicidal ideation disclose to friends or family. Participants were 506 people aged 17–65 recruited from Australia and Korea who completed an experiment in which they responded to a friend who was experiencing either subclinical distress or suicidal ideation. Korean participants did not differentiate between the subclinical and suicidal targets, whereas Australian participants showed more concern for the suicidal target. For both targets, Korean participants were more likely to recommend passive coping strategies (“Time will solve everything” or “Cheer up”), while Australian participants were more likely to recommend active coping strategies (“Let’s talk” or “See a doctor”). This study provides the first evidence of cultural differences in the way people typically respond to disclosures of suicidal ideation, and suggests that unhelpful and inappropriate recommendations are commonplace.
KW - coping strategies
KW - depression
KW - help seeking
KW - mental health
KW - social support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068684613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13811118.2019.1624668
DO - 10.1080/13811118.2019.1624668
M3 - Article
SN - 1381-1118
VL - 24
SP - 415
EP - 434
JO - Archives of Suicide Research
JF - Archives of Suicide Research
IS - 3
ER -