TY - JOUR
T1 - Culturally appropriate indigenous accountability
AU - Rowse, Tim
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Since they renounced the policy goal of assimilation in the 1970s, Australian governments have encouraged indigenous Australians to form corporations. Such bodies receive public money to deliver services, and they have become the sinews of a mobilized indigenous constituency. By reviewing the research and recommendations of a recent Australian government report, this article addresses the controversy about the indigenous corporation's multiple accountability: to the taxpayer, their employees, and their clients. In addition, drawing on recent international theoretical debates about the rationales of liberal tolerance for cultural minorities, this article qualifies the widely held assumption that accountability in this instance must be culturally appropriate.
AB - Since they renounced the policy goal of assimilation in the 1970s, Australian governments have encouraged indigenous Australians to form corporations. Such bodies receive public money to deliver services, and they have become the sinews of a mobilized indigenous constituency. By reviewing the research and recommendations of a recent Australian government report, this article addresses the controversy about the indigenous corporation's multiple accountability: to the taxpayer, their employees, and their clients. In addition, drawing on recent international theoretical debates about the rationales of liberal tolerance for cultural minorities, this article qualifies the widely held assumption that accountability in this instance must be culturally appropriate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24944538522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00027640021955900
DO - 10.1177/00027640021955900
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:24944538522
SN - 0002-7642
VL - 43
SP - 1514
EP - 1532
JO - American Behavioral Scientist
JF - American Behavioral Scientist
IS - 9
ER -