Curating in the Postdigital Age

Anna Edmundson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    It seems nowadays that any aspect of collecting and displaying tangible or intangible material culture is labeled as curating: shopkeepers curate their wares; DJs curate their musical selections; magazine editors curate media stories; and hipsters curate their coffee tables. Given the increasing ubiquity and complexity of 21st-century notions of curatorship, the current issue of MC Journal, curate, provides an excellent opportunity to consider some of the changes that have occurred in professional practice since the emergence of the digital turn. There is no doubt that the internet and interactive media have transformed the way we live our daily livesand for many cultural commentators it only makes sense that they should also transform our cultural experiences. In this paper, I want to examine the issue of curatorial practice in the postdigital age, looking some of the ways that curating has changed over the last twenty yearsand some of the ways it has not. The term postdigital comes from the work of Ross Parry, and is used to references the tipping point where the use of digital technologies became normative practice in museums (24). Overall, I contend that although new technologies have substantially facilitated the way that curators do their jobs, core business and values have not changed as the result of the digital turn. While, major paradigm shifts have occurred in the field of professional curatorship over the last twenty years, these shifts have been issue-driven rather than a result of new technologies.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalM/C - A Journal of Media and Culture
    Volume18
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Curating in the Postdigital Age'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this