Cure, Poison or Placebo? The Consequences of Populist and Radical Party Success for Representative Democracy

Heiko Giebler*, Annika Werner

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The spread and success of radical and populist parties has triggered a profound debate on the state of democracy. Not only are these parties described as the outcome of a democratic malaise in which democratic regimes had ceased to integrate, represent and engage all their citizens. At the same time, questions arose as to the consequences of these parties for existing representative democracies. Could radical and populist parties be a (partial) cure to the woes of established democracies? Or would they make the democratic malaise even worse, further poisoning an already sick patient? Could it be that these parties act like a placebo that exists because of the democratic malaise but does not actually change anything except for those who desperately want to believe in an effect? The contributions to this Special Issue address questions of the impact of radical and populist parties on representative democracy. This introduction systematise their findings along party functions and draws broader conclusions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)293-306
    Number of pages14
    JournalRepresentation
    Volume56
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Jul 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cure, Poison or Placebo? The Consequences of Populist and Radical Party Success for Representative Democracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this