Damaged but determined: The Australian women's movement, 1996-2007

Merrindahl Andrew*, Sarah Maddison

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    What happened to the women's movement in Australia under the conservative Howard government (1996-2007)? Why was there such a slump in energy and impact during this period? And what are the implications for the future? In addressing these questions, this article critically reflects on concepts of abeyance, political opportunity structures and cycles of contention. It highlights the shift to neoliberalism that occurred even before Howard came to power and the loss of the movement's 'novelty value', trends that were intensified by broader ideological shifts under Howard. Using interviews with key activists, the article constructs a detailed historical account, arguing that there was not only a hostile environment that constrained the movement but also that the movement's dynamics, activities and goals changed over time. The article concludes that the Australian women's movement is still surviving, but not thriving.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)171-185
    Number of pages15
    JournalSocial Movement Studies
    Volume9
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Damaged but determined: The Australian women's movement, 1996-2007'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this