TY - JOUR
T1 - Dancing With Restorative Justice: Chinese Legal Professionals and Their Motivational Postures
AU - Zhang, Ian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2025/10/16
Y1 - 2025/10/16
N2 - Drawing on an extension of Valerie Braithwaite's motivational postures theory (MPT), this study provides a nuanced examination of the implementation of restorative justice (RJ) by Chinese legal professionals, including police, prosecutors, and judges. Based on qualitative data from China, the study finds that the interaction among three different selves (moral, professional, and status-seeking) determines the social distance legal professionals maintain from the various RJ programs they implement. By shifting MPT's focus from regulatees to regulators and introducing a professional self to capture role-specific grievances and obligations, this extension illuminates how institutional and political constraints shape adaptive postures in top-down systems. As a result, various legal professionals displayed four motivational postures—commitment, capitulation, resistance, and disengagement—toward RJ in different contexts. This study avoids a simplistic and narrow perspective on the institutionalization of RJ and provides valuable insights into improving policy designs and institutional structures. These improvements aim to foster less defiant and more accommodating postures among legal professionals toward RJ within the mainstream justice system.
AB - Drawing on an extension of Valerie Braithwaite's motivational postures theory (MPT), this study provides a nuanced examination of the implementation of restorative justice (RJ) by Chinese legal professionals, including police, prosecutors, and judges. Based on qualitative data from China, the study finds that the interaction among three different selves (moral, professional, and status-seeking) determines the social distance legal professionals maintain from the various RJ programs they implement. By shifting MPT's focus from regulatees to regulators and introducing a professional self to capture role-specific grievances and obligations, this extension illuminates how institutional and political constraints shape adaptive postures in top-down systems. As a result, various legal professionals displayed four motivational postures—commitment, capitulation, resistance, and disengagement—toward RJ in different contexts. This study avoids a simplistic and narrow perspective on the institutionalization of RJ and provides valuable insights into improving policy designs and institutional structures. These improvements aim to foster less defiant and more accommodating postures among legal professionals toward RJ within the mainstream justice system.
KW - institutionalization
KW - legal professionals
KW - motivational postures
KW - restorative justice
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018816574
U2 - 10.1111/rego.70093
DO - 10.1111/rego.70093
M3 - Article
SN - 1748-5983
JO - Regulation and Governance
JF - Regulation and Governance
ER -