Abstract
This paper argues that the processes of evolutionary selection are becoming increasingly artificial, a trend that goes against the belief in a purely natural selection process claimed by Darwin's natural selection theory. Artificial selection is mentioned by Darwin, but it was ignored by Social Darwinists, and it is all but absent in neo-Darwinian thinking. This omission results in an underestimation of probable impacts of artificial selection upon assumed evolutionary processes, and has implications for the ideological uses of Darwin's language, particularly in relation to poverty and other social inequalities. The influence of artificial selection on genotypic and phenotypic adaptations arguably represents a substantial shift in the presumed path of evolution, a shift laden with both biological and political implications.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-71 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Politics and the Life Sciences |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Darwin, artificial selection, and poverty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver