Abstract
Adopting a single instead of multiple targets can be an effective way to overcome the classic time-inconsistency problem. The choice of a single mandate depends on the trade openness and the credibility. Reduced-form empirical results show as central banks become less credible, they are more likely to adopt a pegged exchange rate, and the tendency to peg depends on trade openness. In a model with “loose commitment,” as credibility falls, either an inflation target or a pegged exchange rate is more likely to be adopted. A relatively closed (highly open) economy would adopt an inflation target (exchange rate peg).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1369-1399 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Journal of Money, Credit and Banking |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dealing with Time Inconsistency: Inflation Targeting versus Exchange Rate Targeting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver