Decision-making in an era of cancer prevention via aspirin: New Zealand needs updated guidelines and risk calculators

Nick Wilson*, Vanessa Selak, Tony Blakely, Josh Knight, Nhung Nghiem, William Leung, Philip Clarke, Rod Jackson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on new systematic reviews of the evidence, the US Preventive Services Task Force has drafted updated guidelines on the use of low-dose aspirin for the primary prevention of both cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. The Task Force generally recommends consideration of aspirin in adults aged 50-69 years with 10-year CVD risk of at least 10%, in who absolute health gain (reduction of CVD and cancer) is estimated to exceed absolute health loss (increase in bleeds). With the ongoing decline in CVD, current risk calculators for New Zealand are probably outdated, so it is difficult to be precise about what proportion of the population is in this risk category (roughly equivalent to 5-year CVD risk ≥5%). Nevertheless, we suspect that most smokers aged 50-69 years, and some non-smokers, would probably meet the new threshold for taking low-dose aspirin. The country therefore needs updated guidelines and risk calculators that are ideally informed by estimates of absolute net health gain (in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per person) and cost-effectiveness. Other improvements to risk calculators include: epidemiological rigour (eg, by addressing competing mortality); providing enhanced graphical display of risk to enhance risk communication; and possibly capturing the issues of medication disutility and comparison with lifestyle changes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-92
Number of pages8
JournalNew Zealand Medical Journal
Volume129
Issue number1431
Publication statusPublished - 11 Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decision-making in an era of cancer prevention via aspirin: New Zealand needs updated guidelines and risk calculators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this