Decisions in Branching Time

Paul Bartha*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter extends the deontic logic of Horty (Agency and deontic logic, 2001) in the direction of decision theory. Horty’s deontic operator, the dominance ought, incorporates many concepts central to decision theory: acts, causal independence, utilities and dominance reasoning. The decision theory associated with dominance reasoning, however, is relatively weak. This chapter suggests that deontic logic can usefully be viewed as proto-decision theory: it provides clear foundations and a logical framework for developing norms of decision of varying strength. Within Horty’s framework, deontic operators stronger than the dominance ought are defined for decisions under ignorance, decisions under risk, and two-person zero-sum games.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOutstanding Contributions to Logic
PublisherSpringer
Pages29-56
Number of pages28
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameOutstanding Contributions to Logic
Volume2
ISSN (Print)2211-2758
ISSN (Electronic)2211-2766

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decisions in Branching Time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this