Declarations of independence

Branden Fitelson, Alan Hájek*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    According to orthodox (Kolmogorovian) probability theory, conditional probabilities are by definition certain ratios of unconditional probabilities. As a result, orthodox conditional probabilities are regarded as undefined whenever their antecedents have zero unconditional probability. This has important ramifications for the notion of probabilistic independence. Traditionally, independence is defined in terms of unconditional probabilities (the factorization of the relevant joint unconditional probabilities). Various “equivalent” formulations of independence can be given using conditional probabilities. But these “equivalences” break down if conditional probabilities are permitted to have conditions with zero unconditional probability. We reconsider probabilistic independence in this more general setting. We argue that a less orthodox but more general (Popperian) theory of conditional probability should be used, and that much of the conventional wisdom about probabilistic independence needs to be rethought.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3979-3995
    Number of pages17
    JournalSynthese
    Volume194
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Declarations of independence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this