Deference and indirect expropriation analysis in international investment law: Observations on current approaches and frameworks for future analysis

Esmé Shirlow

doi:10.1093/icsidreview/siu012

Deference and indirect expropriation analysis in international investment law: Observations on current approaches and frameworks for future analysis

Esmé Shirlow^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

T]he failure of some arbitral tribunals to recognize the public nature of investment treaty arbitration, and to allow States a sufficient margin to determine and implement various policy goals, has contributed to the legitimacy crisis in which the investment treaty system currently finds itself

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	595-626
Number of pages	32
Journal	ICSID Review
Volume	29
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siu012
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2014
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1093/icsidreview/siu012

Cite this

@article{47963ccf5d9946d884736dbd7d6582d0,

title = "Deference and indirect expropriation analysis in international investment law: Observations on current approaches and frameworks for future analysis",

abstract = "T]he failure of some arbitral tribunals to recognize the public nature of investment treaty arbitration, and to allow States a sufficient margin to determine and implement various policy goals, has contributed to the legitimacy crisis in which the investment treaty system currently finds itself",

author = "Esm{\'e} Shirlow",

year = "2014",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/icsidreview/siu012",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "595--626",

journal = "ICSID Review",

issn = "0258-3690",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deference and indirect expropriation analysis in international investment law

T2 - Observations on current approaches and frameworks for future analysis

AU - Shirlow, Esmé

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - T]he failure of some arbitral tribunals to recognize the public nature of investment treaty arbitration, and to allow States a sufficient margin to determine and implement various policy goals, has contributed to the legitimacy crisis in which the investment treaty system currently finds itself

AB - T]he failure of some arbitral tribunals to recognize the public nature of investment treaty arbitration, and to allow States a sufficient margin to determine and implement various policy goals, has contributed to the legitimacy crisis in which the investment treaty system currently finds itself

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942773713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/icsidreview/siu012

DO - 10.1093/icsidreview/siu012

M3 - Article

SN - 0258-3690

VL - 29

SP - 595

EP - 626

JO - ICSID Review

JF - ICSID Review

IS - 3

ER -

Deference and indirect expropriation analysis in international investment law: Observations on current approaches and frameworks for future analysis

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this