Deficit by design

Barry Hindess*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper focuses on the distinguishing concern of the discourse of democratic deficit: namely, that there appear to be some striking discrepancies between democratic norms and institutional practice. I argue in this paper that the problem of democratic deficit is in fact the normal condition of the institutions of representative government. Indeed, early arguments in favour of representative government insist that it departs from and is superior to democracy itself. If representative government provides the predominant modern understanding of democracy, then democratic deficit is an integral part of its design.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)30-38
    Number of pages9
    JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
    Volume61
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Deficit by design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this